Arts & Culture

The Last Showgirl: Diamonds Show the Window to a Woman’s Soul?

By Katie Blaney

‘I just hope they love it and come back to it as something that has so many nuances and layers to it, as well as to celebrate women, imperfect humans. To follow your dreams and know it is never too late’ – Pamela Anderson [1].

Gia Coppola’s The Last Showgirl is a searing critique of Hollywood’s treatment of aging women, anchored by a career-defining performance from Pamela Anderson. The film offers a raw and unflinching look at how the entertainment industry discards women once they pass their perceived prime, favouring youth over experience. Anderson’s role is particularly powerful, as it closely mirrors her own journey in the public eye, making the film’s message even more resonant.

By blending fiction with reality, Coppola exposes the deep-rooted double standards that allow men to thrive well into their later years while women are pushed aside. Anderson’s portrayal adds depth and authenticity, turning The Last Showgirl into more than just a character study—it is a call to rethink how society values women in entertainment. With a mix of sharp critique and emotional depth, the film challenges audiences to confront the industry’s ageism and recognise the enduring power of reinvention.

The film’s mise-en-scène starkly contrasts the dazzling glamour of Las Vegas showrooms with the quiet isolation Shelly Gardner (Pamela Anderson) faces as she is forced out of the industry. In her prime, she is framed against the neon-lit spectacle of the stage, adorned in rhinestones, and surrounded by an audience that adores her. Although, once her show is shut down, the setting shifts—her world is reduced to empty dressing rooms, lonely suburban spaces, and impersonal audition rooms where she is met with indifference. These visual choices serve as a metaphor for how

Hollywood often strips older women of relevance, relegating them to the background, once they are deemed past their prime. Anderson herself has spoken about the industry’s tendency to push women into obscurity as they age, making Shelly’s experience feel strikingly personal.

Coppola’s cinematography further amplifies this theme, capturing Shelly’s internal struggle through intimate close-ups that reveal every flicker of doubt, pain, and resilience. Soft, golden lighting bathes her in warmth during flashbacks, evoking nostalgia for a time when she was valued and desired. In contrast, present-day scenes are often cast in cold, muted tones, mirroring the harsh reality of an industry that prioritises youth. The frequent use of mirrors in key moments reinforces the film’s central message—Shelly, like so many women in entertainment, is constantly forced to confront her own image in a world that defines her worth by her appearance. This visual motif echoes Anderson’s own experience, having spent decades under the relentless scrutiny of the media, judged not for her talent but for how well she has ‘preserved’ her looks.

One of the most searing critiques of Hollywood’s ageism comes in a particularly devastating scene where Shelly auditions for a new dance revue, hoping to revive her career. Despite her extensive experience and undeniable talent, she is dismissed almost immediately by the younger, male director. He coldly tells her that her style is “outdated” and that they are looking for something fresher. The humiliation on Shelly’s face is palpable—this is not about her ability, but about the industry’s obsession with youth. The moment encapsulates the entertainment world’s tendency to devalue women as they age, regardless of their skill, experience, or contributions. It is a painful but all-too-familiar scenario, one that many veteran actresses have spoken out about.

Costuming is another powerful tool used to reflect Shelly’s journey. Her showgirl costumes—dazzling leotards encrusted with rhinestones, feathered headdresses, and sky-high heels—represent the identity she has crafted over decades. Yet, when she steps offstage, her wardrobe shifts dramatically to simple, understated clothing. This contrast visually reinforces how the industry strips women of their allure and perceived worth once they are no longer performing. Over the course of the film, her clothing evolves, symbolising her journey of self-reclamation. Similarly, Anderson’s real-life reinvention—from a sex symbol to an advocate for self-acceptance—mirrors this transformation, making the film feel even more poignant.

Through its careful visual storytelling, The Last Showgirl does more than depict the struggles of an aging performer—it shows the audience the brutal reality of an industry that worships youth and discards experience. By casting Pamela Anderson, a woman who has lived through Hollywood’s double standards firsthand, Coppola adds an extra layer of authenticity to the film’s critique. The result is a deeply personal yet universal exploration of what it means to age in a world that refuses to let women grow old.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

References:

[1] Gates, M. (2025) This is just the beginning: Pamela Anderson on ‘The last showgirl’: Interviews, Roger Ebert. Available at: https://www.rogerebert.com/interviews/pamela-anderson-the-last-showgirl-interview

The Gown Queen's University Belfast

The Gown has provided respected, quality and independent student journalism from Queen's University, Belfast since its 1955 foundation, by Dr. Richard Herman. Having had an illustrious line of journalists and writers for almost 70 years, that proud history is extremely important to us. The Gown is consistent in its quest to seek and develop the talents of aspiring student writers.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Gown

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading